Newsletter Signup
Community
SolidGospel.com Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Southern Gospel Folder

Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
  Sponsor

RE: John MacArthur

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> The Church >> RE: John MacArthur
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: John MacArthur - 9/25/2008 8:09:05 PM   
colliefan

 

Posts: 2785
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cwb
Lordship salvation? What in the world does that mean?
Sounds like religious babble...
If it's salvation through Christ and Christ alone, I don't think such terminology is necessary, is it?



It is NOT religous babble and it is necessary. In too much of the church one can "come to Jesus" w/o any renouncing of sin. Yes, Jesus is savior but having him in control of all aspects of life - LORD - is something that can happen later on. In the same manner, discipleship is not an option; it is madatory.
Post #: 301
RE: John MacArthur - 9/25/2008 8:47:48 PM   
cwb


Posts: 208
Joined: 1/15/2007
From: Eastern NC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ta_mosquito

Moving this from FaithWalk to The Church.

Thanks!

Tricia
Forums Moderator

Please do not reply to this message within the forums or chat.

Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns.

Please do not send me PMs regarding this message.



John McArther is a ministry leader.

How come this wasn't moved to ministry leaders?

And how come it started in faithwalk???

_____________________________

We are to do the will of God from our heart. Eph Ch 6 v. 6
Post #: 302
RE: John MacArthur - 9/25/2008 8:51:15 PM   
JamesL5

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 8/26/2007
Status: offline
I like preachers that talk about sin. Why? Because I am a sinner and someone needs to remind me of this so that I can be humble about it everyday. I know that most folks don't like to be lectured on sin but I got news for you, the bible mentions sin over and over again. As a matter of fact, I think Jesus talked more about hell than He did about heaven.
Post #: 303
RE: John MacArthur - 9/25/2008 8:52:30 PM   
cwb


Posts: 208
Joined: 1/15/2007
From: Eastern NC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: colliefan

quote:

ORIGINAL: cwb
Lordship salvation? What in the world does that mean?
Sounds like religious babble...
If it's salvation through Christ and Christ alone, I don't think such terminology is necessary, is it?



It is NOT religous babble and it is necessary. In too much of the church one can "come to Jesus" w/o any renouncing of sin. Yes, Jesus is savior but having him in control of all aspects of life - LORD - is something that can happen later on. In the same manner, discipleship is not an option; it is madatory.


This is salvation without repentance? Isn't that just non-sensical babble? Because it's not salvation.

You goin' to see Jeremiah at RBC in October there collie?

_____________________________

We are to do the will of God from our heart. Eph Ch 6 v. 6
Post #: 304
RE: John MacArthur - 9/25/2008 8:52:56 PM   
prophet

 

Posts: 571
Joined: 4/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JamesL5

I like preachers that talk about sin. Why? Because I am a sinner and someone needs to remind me of this fact so that I can be humble about it everyday. I know that most folks don't like to be lectured on sin but I got news for you, the bible mentions sin over and over again. As a matter of fact, I think Jesus talked more about hell than He did about heaven.

Amen!

_____________________________

Create in me a Clean Heart, O Lord.
Post #: 305
RE: John MacArthur - 9/25/2008 8:54:32 PM   
cwb


Posts: 208
Joined: 1/15/2007
From: Eastern NC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JamesL5

I like preachers that talk about sin. Why? Because I am a sinner and someone needs to remind me of this so that I can be humble about it everyday. I know that most folks don't like to be lectured on sin but I got news for you, the bible mentions sin over and over again. As a matter of fact, I think Jesus talked more about hell than He did about heaven.


Absolutely.

They don't preach hellfire and damnation anymore.

Better make 'em uncomfortable now, rather than later...

_____________________________

We are to do the will of God from our heart. Eph Ch 6 v. 6
Post #: 306
RE: John MacArthur - 9/25/2008 9:13:29 PM   
colliefan

 

Posts: 2785
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: offline
quote:


This is salvation without repentance? Isn't that just non-sensical babble? Because it's not salvation. You goin' to see Jeremiah at RBC in October there collie?


Yes. My prison minitry at Central Prison is canceled that night because of the end of Ramadan so I will be there.
Post #: 307
RE: John MacArthur - 9/29/2008 11:45:00 AM   
mcleod

 

Posts: 1071
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

We can never be completely satisified in this life as we will still be touched by the effects of sin and the fall. If we were to be complete in this life, why would there be a heaven?


Did not Paul said that he learn to be content with what he has. "I rejoice greatly in the Lord that at last you have renewed your concern for me. Indeed you have been concerned, but you had no opportunity to show it. I am not saying this because I am in need, for I have learned to be content whatever the circumstances. I know it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every sitution, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plrenty or in want. I can do everything through him who gives me strenght."
Post #: 308
RE: John MacArthur - 9/29/2008 12:58:53 PM   
colliefan

 

Posts: 2785
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: offline
Content does not mean that one is completely satisfied. It is knowing that others will have more than you and others have less than you, God has met your needs; in this, one is content with lack.
Post #: 309
RE: John MacArthur - 9/29/2008 4:10:38 PM   
mcleod

 

Posts: 1071
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: colliefan

Content does not mean that one is completely satisfied. It is knowing that others will have more than you and others have less than you, God has met your needs; in this, one is content with lack.


I think Paul would disagree with you if I understand where you are coming from.

"I have learned the secret of being content in any and every sitution, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plrenty or in want. I can do everything through him who gives me strenght."
Post #: 310
RE: John MacArthur - 9/29/2008 4:29:53 PM   
bride48


Posts: 5581
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Near Boston
Status: offline
Paul also longed for heaven, though, and he emphasized keeping our hope there.

Phil 3:12-4:1
12 Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected; but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me. 13 Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, 14 I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. 15 Therefore let us, as many as are mature, have this mind; and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal even this to you. 16 Nevertheless, to the degree that we have already attained, let us walk by the same rule, let us be of the same mind.

17 Brethren, join in following my example, and note those who so walk, as you have us for a pattern. 18 For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: 19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame--who set their mind on earthly things. 20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, 21 who will transform our lowly body that it may be conformed to His glorious body, according to the working by which He is able even to subdue all things to Himself.

NKJV

This life isn't all there is, and that's the point MacArthur was attempting to make. He was contrasting the materialistic mindset of evolution with the spiritual hope of Christianity. We can be content in this life because we know that wonderful things await us in eternity!

_____________________________


Joyfully,
DebbieLynne

Thankfulness (my latest blog entry)
Post #: 311
RE: John MacArthur - 9/29/2008 5:22:06 PM   
colliefan

 

Posts: 2785
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: offline
Phil 4:10 - 14 (HCSB) 10I rejoiced in the Lord greatly that now at last you have renewed your care for me. You were, in fact, concerned about me, but lacked the opportunity ëto show it. 11I don’t say this out of need, for I have learned to be content in whatever circumstances I am. 12I know both how to have a little, and I know how to have a lot.£ In any and all circumstances I have learned the secret ëof being contentû—whether well-fed or hungry, whether in abundance or in need. 13I am able to do all things through Him£ who strengthens me.£ 14Still, you did well by sharing with me in my hardship.


1 Tim 6:6 - 10 (HCSB) 6But godliness with contentment is a great gain.£ 7 For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out.£ 8 But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with these. 9But those who want to be rich fall into temptation, a trap, and many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge people into ruin and destruction. 10For the love of money is a root£ of all kinds of evil, and by craving it, some have wandered away from the faith£ and pierced themselves with many pains.


The issue is not having need, but one handles lack. Anyway we are getting off-topic
Post #: 312
RE: John MacArthur - 9/30/2008 11:04:10 AM   
mcleod

 

Posts: 1071
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

This life isn't all there is, and that's the point MacArthur was attempting to make. He was contrasting the materialistic mindset of evolution with the spiritual hope of Christianity. We can be content in this life because we know that wonderful things await us in eternity!



For right now it is what matters is this life. You could end up and not be satisfied in heaven because you could not learn it here.

The children of Israel as they had just went through a great wall of water. Which rescued them from Pharoah and his bad plans for their lifes. Went and complained to Moses about a place God lead them to because the water was bitter. Time after time the children of Israel, tried God's mercy. Until the end, what could have been their journey's end. When he told them to go and take the land and they refused and wanted to go back to Egypt. Because it was better in Egypt for them to live. They learned not to be content in what had been given to them.

quote:

Phil 4:10 - 14 (HCSB) 10I rejoiced in the Lord greatly that now at last you have renewed your care for me. You were, in fact, concerned about me, but lacked the opportunity ëto show it. 11I don’t say this out of need, for I have learned to be content in whatever circumstances I am. 12I know both how to have a little, and I know how to have a lot.£ In any and all circumstances I have learned the secret ëof being contentû—whether well-fed or hungry, whether in abundance or in need. 13I am able to do all things through Him£ who strengthens me.£ 14Still, you did well by sharing with me in my hardship.


1 Tim 6:6 - 10 (HCSB) 6But godliness with contentment is a great gain.£ 7 For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out.£ 8 But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with these. 9But those who want to be rich fall into temptation, a trap, and many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge people into ruin and destruction. 10For the love of money is a root£ of all kinds of evil, and by craving it, some have wandered away from the faith£ and pierced themselves with many pains.


The issue is not having need, but one handles lack. Anyway we are getting off-topic


You are the one who brought up the subject. So you must have made a mistake when you first talked about the word; content.
Post #: 313
RE: John MacArthur - 10/7/2008 9:33:56 PM   
humbleinspirit


Posts: 18135
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: Just Outside of Boston
Status: offline
I've been listening to his show this week regarding anxiety, etc. I agree with him for the most part. I must admit this is one of the very few times that I have noticed compassion in his preaching as opposed to judgement instead. It is a very welcome change!

_____________________________

Post #: 314
RE: John MacArthur - 10/7/2008 10:34:59 PM   
JamesL5

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 8/26/2007
Status: offline
I like MacArthur as a preacher. With that said, I was very disappointed with him as a person for condoning the War in Iraq on the CNN Larry King Show. MacArthur had the audacity to use a verse from the bible to support the Invasion of Iraq. The scripture he quoted had absolutely nothing to do with the Iraq War. However, I still like MacArthur as a preacher.
Post #: 315
RE: John MacArthur - 10/7/2008 10:35:41 PM   
humbleinspirit


Posts: 18135
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: Just Outside of Boston
Status: offline
I am just curious, what scripture did he use?

_____________________________

Post #: 316
RE: John MacArthur - 10/7/2008 10:55:39 PM   
JamesL5

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 8/26/2007
Status: offline
humbleinspirit,

John MacArthur used these 2 verses to justify the Invasion of Iraq.

"Or what king, when he sets out to meet another king in battle will not first sit down and take counsel whether he is strong enough with ten thousand men to encounter the one coming against him with twenty thousand?" (Luke 14:31)

"But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one." (Luke 22:36).

John MacArthur concluded by saying "He (God) endorsed the fact of protection and just war."

MacArthur was WRONG........

< Message edited by JamesL5 -- 10/8/2008 12:09:19 AM >
Post #: 317
RE: John MacArthur - 10/7/2008 10:56:34 PM   
humbleinspirit


Posts: 18135
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: Just Outside of Boston
Status: offline
I agree with you on that, hmmmm!

_____________________________

Post #: 318
RE: John MacArthur - 10/8/2008 8:23:52 AM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JamesL5

humbleinspirit,

John MacArthur used these 2 verses to justify the Invasion of Iraq.

"Or what king, when he sets out to meet another king in battle will not first sit down and take counsel whether he is strong enough with ten thousand men to encounter the one coming against him with twenty thousand?" (Luke 14:31)

"But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one." (Luke 22:36).

John MacArthur concluded by saying "He (God) endorsed the fact of protection and just war."

MacArthur was WRONG........

I agree with the principles MacArthur was making. Scripture clearly endorses war against evil and protection of one's country, family, and self.
Post #: 319
RE: John MacArthur - 10/8/2008 8:28:51 AM   
TheosCentric

 

Posts: 1938
Joined: 2/26/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JimboFletch

quote:

ORIGINAL: JamesL5

humbleinspirit,

John MacArthur used these 2 verses to justify the Invasion of Iraq.

"Or what king, when he sets out to meet another king in battle will not first sit down and take counsel whether he is strong enough with ten thousand men to encounter the one coming against him with twenty thousand?" (Luke 14:31)

"But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one." (Luke 22:36).

John MacArthur concluded by saying "He (God) endorsed the fact of protection and just war."

MacArthur was WRONG........

I agree with the principles MacArthur was making. Scripture clearly endorses war against evil and protection of one's country, family, and self.

In a situation like Iraq, we have a country that was not a threat to the U.S.

MacArthur was trying to make a case for a "just war," but fails probably because he's making the case in light of his dispensationalism.

_____________________________

"Missions exists because worship doesn't." -- John Piper, Let the Nations be Glad
God at the Center
Post #: 320
RE: John MacArthur - 10/8/2008 8:51:31 AM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheosCentric
In a situation like Iraq, we have a country that was not a threat to the U.S.

It all depends on how one defines "threat" and just how much credit one was willing to give Hussein, despite his history. Given what I knew at the time, I would have been willing to make the decision to attack, feeling that Iraq was a serious threat and that Hussein worth defeating for the stability of much of the world. And that without any consideration to dispensationalism.
Post #: 321
RE: John MacArthur - 10/8/2008 9:23:09 AM   
TheosCentric

 

Posts: 1938
Joined: 2/26/2006
Status: offline
1) I respect MacArthur for the most part, with exception to his dispensationalist beliefs.

2) That being said, many Western pastors (most notably Falwell, Hagee, and others of the Dispie mindset) view "Just War" in light of protecting Israel.

3) Looking at the facts presented in leading up to the Iraq War, it would seem that it was a just war, but looking back, one can see that the facts did not line up even then. They say, "hindsight is 20/20," and in this case, it very much is.

4) Perhaps MacArthur was not looking at through dispie eyes, but many preachers do. And that's a shame.

_____________________________

"Missions exists because worship doesn't." -- John Piper, Let the Nations be Glad
God at the Center
Post #: 322
RE: John MacArthur - 10/8/2008 9:30:14 AM   
mcleod

 

Posts: 1071
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
This is a good one;

quote:

It all depends on how one defines "threat" and just how much credit one was willing to give Hussein, despite his history. Given what I knew at the time, I would have been willing to make the decision to attack, feeling that Iraq was a serious threat and that Hussein worth defeating for the stability of much of the world. And that without any consideration to dispensationalism


Let's see North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and even China. The list keeps going and going onward to the extend of most of the world is actual against us. So let us bear arms against them all right?
I believe that old Bush had a thing against Hussien. For threating his dad's life to be taken. By the way after watching 60 minuties last Sunday.
Wonder were our boys were getting thier commands to let Bin Laden escape from their grasp all the time. When they had him cornered a lot of the time. That when they had premission to go see a cave that they had bomb a few weeks earlier. Found that he may have escape that and ended up in Pakistan.
Post #: 323
RE: John MacArthur - 10/8/2008 9:32:51 AM   
TheosCentric

 

Posts: 1938
Joined: 2/26/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mcleod

This is a good one;

quote:

It all depends on how one defines "threat" and just how much credit one was willing to give Hussein, despite his history. Given what I knew at the time, I would have been willing to make the decision to attack, feeling that Iraq was a serious threat and that Hussein worth defeating for the stability of much of the world. And that without any consideration to dispensationalism


Let's see North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and even China. The list keeps going and going onward to the extend of most of the world is actual against us. So let us bear arms against them all right?
I believe that old Bush had a thing against Hussien. For threating his dad's life to be taken. By the way after watching 60 minuties last Sunday.
Wonder were our boys were getting thier commands to let Bin Laden escape from their grasp all the time. When they had him cornered a lot of the time. That when they had premission to go see a cave that they had bomb a few weeks earlier. Found that he may have escape that and ended up in Pakistan.

Getting off-topic....

The point was in pointing out MacArthur's use of the "just war" theory. Not discussion the evils of other countries

_____________________________

"Missions exists because worship doesn't." -- John Piper, Let the Nations be Glad
God at the Center
Post #: 324
RE: John MacArthur - 10/8/2008 9:55:07 AM   
JimboFletch


Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mcleod

This is a good one;

quote:

It all depends on how one defines "threat" and just how much credit one was willing to give Hussein, despite his history. Given what I knew at the time, I would have been willing to make the decision to attack, feeling that Iraq was a serious threat and that Hussein worth defeating for the stability of much of the world. And that without any consideration to dispensationalism

[Other unrelated diatribe removed.]

Thanks.
Post #: 325
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Theology] >> The Church >> RE: John MacArthur
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


SolidGospel.com Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Southern Gospel Folder

F